Mon - Fri : 7:00 AM - 03:30 PM

Authori<span id="more-9089"></span>ties Find Resolution in Borgata Cheating Fiasco

Atlantic City’s Borgata Casino will redistribute competition winnings following a major chip-cheating scandal that rocked the Borgata Winter Poker Open in January. (Image:

The New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement (DGE) has already reached a quality regarding the Borgata Winter Poker Open chips that are counterfeit at last. The competition was suspended on January 18th, and afterwards cancelled, following the revelation that the poker that is fake had been introduced.

The DGE certainly had their work cut out in reaching an equitable solution to a very sticky problem: whenever play was stopped, there were 27 players left of 4,824 initial entrants in the $500 + 60 NLH Big Stack event, which had a guaranteed prize pool of $2 million. As the perpetrator associated with scam, a one-time chip frontrunner named Christian Lusardi, actually busted on Day 2 for $6,814, it ended up beingn’t simply a matter of confiscating his ill-gotten winnings and paying the bubble boy.

Ripple Effect

Investigators had to determine which players among this huge industry could be thought to have been adversely suffering from the cheating and discover a reasonable way to circulate an overall total of $1,721,805 to those who deserved it. That includes $1,433,145 in prize money, in addition to $288,720 the Borgata collected in registration fees. This also meant attempting to quantify the intangible ‘ripple effect’ that Lusardi’s scam might have caused; a task that is almost impossible.

The DGE decided that 2143 entrants who failed to money had been entitled for their money back (buy-in plus reg fee). These included all players who played on Day 1a from 10am, apart from those who started in the Event Center and were eliminated before 4:30pm, once the latter group could not have come right into connection with Lusardi. Since it in fact was a reentry tournament, Lusardi was also playing on Day 1b, having busted Day 1a, and therefore all players who played that day from 10am are qualified, aside from people who played in the Signature Room and Poker Room. Meanwhile, the $50,893 in rewards owed to players who busted into the money will be paid as scheduled, while the residual 27 players still ‘in’ will chop the rest for $19,323 each.

While this would be seemingly the fairest solution offered the circumstances, the Borgata may still have headache to deal with. In February, a lawsuit that is class-action filed by brand New Jersey attorney Bruce Li Causi with respect to one of the players, Jacob Mustere. The lawsuit claimed that players must be liable to damages in addition to refunds. At the time of writing, it is not known whether Causi’s customer is satisfied with the settlement that is current.

Money Down the Could

Meanwhile, Lusardi stays in jail in brand New Jersey on $300,000 relationship, waiting for trial. He was arrested after attempting to flush 2.7 million in fake tournament potato chips down the toilet of his college accommodation at the nearby Harrah’s Resort. This resulted in the pipes becoming clogged, which caused water to drip on to the available rooms of guests on the floor below. He is also faced with running a large-scale pirate DVD operation from his North Carolina home that allegedly grossed over $1 million.

The Borgata has since introduced new high-tech poker potato chips that are more intricately designed, making them harder to counterfeit, and that can be checked under ultraviolet light.

Everett May Purchase Land for Wynn Casino

Will the town of Everett buy this site of a Monsanto that is former chemical for Wynn Everett? Mayor Carlo DeMaria hopes therefore. (Image:

It appears that every time an obstacle emerges for starters of the proposed Massachusetts casino plans, someone or something measures up to provide a solution. So when there were questions about that would benefit from the sale of land Wynn Resorts would use to host their Everett casino, perhaps we should have expected a resolution to too present itself before long.

Eminent Domain Buy Considered

In this instance, the town of Everett itself may eventually get the property before selling it to Wynn, sidestepping the murky situation that currently surrounds the land sale. The town would use their power of eminent domain to buy the land also seven other properties in the area for a price that is total of $41 million. The land required for the casino could then be offered to Wynn from the city.

According to Mayor Carlo DeMaria, this move wouldn’t be solely for the benefit of Steve Wynn and the prospective casino resort he really wants to build. Rather, this is a plan which was in development before anyone considered bringing gambling to the city.

‘This area, when you are well aware, is important to your future success regarding the entire city and will serve as a gateway to the entire region,’ DeMaria penned in a letter to Everett city councilors final week. ‘My administration is committed to realizing the potential that is extraordinary of area and the city as being a whole.’

Controversy Over Secret Partners

While the city may be willing to buy the land to be able to develop it, that wasn’t the proposal that is original was banking on. They decided to purchase the land for $35 million, presuming that the Massachusetts Gaming Commission was to approve their casino plan.

As we recently reported, the controversy throughout the land began after payment investigators discovered that the current owners of the property FBT Everett Realty may be lying about the involvement of Charles Lightbody, one of these original partners. Lightbody, a convicted felon, claimed to possess sold off his interest in the home long ago, despite having put up $1 million regarding the original $8 million purchase price during 2009.

That could were resolved if the other owners had pledged that the property sale wouldn’t benefit any unknown, key lovers. By Anthony Gattineri has refused to sign such a pledge, fueling speculation that Lightbody might have a pastime. And considering that the payment has required the statements become signed in order to accept Wynn’s license, the sale has been put by it in question.

A Public Purpose?

The question of whether or not the populous city of Everett can get around this issue by using eminent domain could be tricky. The city can only take private land if doing so serves a public purpose under state law. Mayor DeMaria claims the land is good for redevelopment and that the populous city would spend tens of millions to upgrade the location after the purchase.

But not everyone is convinced that anyone would develop the area if Wynn doesn’t obtain the casino permit. City Council president Michael Marchese claims he appears at the proposition as nothing less than a favor to Wynn.

‘We haven’t had a developer here in over 20 years,’ Marchese said. ‘We only know just what we hear, and what we hear we don’t trust.’

Illinois Rep Bob Rita OffersTwo Plans for Chicago Casino Expansion

Will Illinois legislators approve either of Rep. Bob Rita’s land gaming proposals? The jury’s still down. (Image:

It’s not hard to imagine so just how profitable a massive casino placed in Chicago could become. It’s been a dream of many for years now, though never one which includes come anywhere near fruition. Now, one lawmaker has placed two proposals for such a casino before an Illinois House committee though the probability of either ultimately passing into law are slim at best.

Two Plans, One Man

Representative Bob Rita (D-Blue Island) has put together two versions of the plan that will bring casino gambling to Chicago. In the very first version, designed to appease as many interest groups as you are able to, five new gambling enterprises would be authorized. That would include a Chicago casino with up to 4,000 games, along with smaller casinos in Rockford, Danville, Lake County and another suburb to the south of Chicago. It could also give racetracks the best to host a number that is varying of machines, up to 600 for locations in Cook County.

But that is not the plan that received the attention of the Illinois home. It’s an alternative Rita-backed plan one that would accept just a single casino with up to 10,000 games in Chicago that promised to cause plenty of heated arguments on both sides of the issue.

Chicago vs. Downstate Illinois

Rita is hoping that by talking to lawmakers, they can convince them that a huge Chicago casino will benefit the whole state. His plan would see half of all revenues from the proposed casino fund projects throughout the state.

‘It’s part of the process of moving this ahead,’ Rita stated before the hearing. ‘ We have never ever had the full in-depth conversation or a hearing of a Chicago-only choice.’

The plan that is single-venue popular with the Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce, which said during the hearing that they would like a casino in the central part of downtown Chicago. Governor Pat Quinn in addition has suggested that this form of the bill is more likely to earn his support than past bills that he has vetoed.

But politicians through the rest of the continuing state are predictably suspicious of any plan that would expand gambling just within the city.

‘The purpose [of gambling expansion] would be to help communities that are economically distressed’ said state Representative Chad Hays (R-Catlin). ‘ I would recommend that downstate taking the leftover crumbs from Chicago is really a laughable assertion that no downstater would bite on.’

A Term from the Mayor

Danville Mayor Scott Eisenhauer also weighed in against A chicago-only plan.

‘The opportunity to add downstate job creation and revenue growth far outweighs the benefits of A chicago-only permit,’ said Eisenhauer, who also planned to attend the hearings.

Representatives from social groups spoke at the hearings to state that they were focused on the impact a massive casino would have on the state. Meanwhile, other casinos stressed that a large location in Chicago would hurt their businesses. And the horse industry that is racing both the single-casino and broader expansion plans, as they want much more slots available at their tracks.

With so opposition that is much across the state, numerous lawmakers feel that just a wider gambling bill has any chance of success.