Maybe Not everyone carrying an axe is a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Probably not, since most lumberjacks don’t generally carry their axes around with them on nights out. But two stories have popped up in the news showing that non-lumberjacks don’t necessarily stick to these rules.
The first of these two tales of violence occurred in a village bar in Fontaniva, Italy, in which a disgruntled gambler decided to exact his revenge on some slots that are unsuspecting after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in two weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video streaming internet sites, where viewers can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
After blowing down steam, the machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but maybe not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either this is a sign of victory, or a show of friendship towards these machines that are particular. Whenever working with crazy, interpretations are anybody’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a bar that is nearby.
‘ He comes in here all of the time to relax and play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, whom chose probably wisely- to remain nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a complete lot of money. He could be a laborer and only works every now and then.’ Apparently, this might be one worker who keeps his very own equipment handy.
‘He’s normally a very quiet man. He just stepped in really calmly having an axe and smashed all the devices. There were several customers they were terrified,’ he added by them at the time and.
As a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst, the guy was sentenced for half a year for criminal damage and possession of an unpleasant weapon. But prison overcrowding got him off with nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.
The second among these two stories is just a bit more frightening, once the axe was wielded not during the slots, but at a person in the staff at a gambling store in the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ incident left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes betting shop in Cardiff ‘in a situation of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making off with a few cash, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over their head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ employee with injury or worse if he don’t comply.
A police spokesperson investigating the criminal activity said that two men, both ski that is wearing, entered the bookie’s store at 9:30 pm in the nights the incident. One calmly endured guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the associate using the tree-chopping gun.
The frightened shop assistant then handed over what police described as a ‘quantity of money,’ as well as the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by a third suspect.
Police are now appealing to the public that is local information that could help apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did not wait calmly for arresting officers to show up in the scene.
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
Whilst each and every of the 3 certification battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has had its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight over the casino slated to be located in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston candidate that is mayoral threatening a lawsuit over one particular proposition that would put a casino in the neighboring town of Everett.
The appropriate choice is pertaining to the idea that neighboring communities https://myfreepokies.com/more-chilli-slot-review/ could be affected by casino projects, but won’t have the opportunity to vote on whether those casinos is opened in the first place. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, a candidate for mayor of Boston, happens to be one of the handful of candidates whom have suggested that all of Boston should manage to vote on a casino that might be located in East Boston, as an example.
It is unfair to the surrounding communities when it comes to the proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote on. If the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would register suit to stop the Everett casino based regarding the impact it would have on many Boston communities.
‘The Wynn proposal ended up being voted…on in only one community,’ Conley stated within a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will bear its traffic, economic, and burdens that are social get none of the proposed advantages.’
According to the state laws that produced the opportunity for three new casinos in Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get yourself a vote on whether or not allowing the projects to be built. However, casino developers are needed to negotiate compensation, with arbitration needed in the event that gambling enterprises and governments that are localn’t arrived at an answer on their own.
Conley has proposed taking a path that is not actually outlined in the 2011 casino law with regards to the East Boston casino proposal, one that’s being developed by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He might have the complete city of Boston vote on whether to accept the proposal, while still granting East Boston veto power within the entire vote. In other terms, the casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the whole city in an effort to be authorized.
While Conley have not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal, a Boston Globe survey discovered that six for the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question had been in favor of it, with only two coming out against it (with Conley and an added candidate not responding to the question). Meanwhile, four of ten prospects supported allowing the city that is entire vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to simply East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents discovered that 44% were in favor of the casino, while 37% opposed it.
No matter if voters back these proposals, just one will ultimately be chosen by their state because the future site of a casino in the Boston area. Along side the Everett and East Boston casino plans, addititionally there is a proposal that is competing Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Chuka Umunna, taken to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the increasing celebrity of the united kingdom’s Labour Party who has publicly announced their discontent towards the bookmaking industry got his or her own hand caught in the recreations book cookie container after accepting a donation of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from a retired leading activities company that is betting.
As a betting store critic whom has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nevertheless accepted the big donation from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing members of the Conservative Party to call the shadow business secretary out, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double criteria.
Since Gala Coral Group is certainly one of this largest bookies in Britain and accounts for a large numbers of betting outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the country- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign directed at reducing the spread of bookies and betting stores in the local streets of his south London Streatham constituency, and went as far as to promise ‘new powers to control the number of betting shops.’
‘we know there was concern that is huge some streets in our area are steadily filling up with betting shops and payday loan companies that take advantage of our community, as opposed to help us,’ wrote Umunna in a study to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly believe anything Chuka ever Umunna states?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says one thing in public areas and does another behind closed doors. Their hypocrisy seems to be limitless.’ And that’s very unusual for a politician.
But, fighting back in the corner of this Labour Party MP, a spokesperson for Umunna reported that ‘this donation was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a personal capacity, and was accepted in accordance with all the guidelines and correctly declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the workplace of Chuka Umunna in his capacity as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, and for staffing,’ so it will officially pass as legitimate.
And while Goulden is not head of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he invested as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group means he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether it is a entirely innocent contribution or not, and whether or perhaps not the Conservative Party may just be searching to ruin the promotion of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after using such a difficult stance against the spread of the industry in their neighborhood constituency.
‘ The only thing we know he truly believes is that the capital is filled with ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ claimed Bob Neill.
Umunna, who is considered to be considered a future Labour Party leader, has already experienced his fair share of embarrassment as earlier this present year their workplace had been accused of modifying his Wikipedia page showing evaluations between himself and Barack Obama.